2006 (1) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appeared on behalf of the respondent. 2. The Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). In this case the respondent cleared 12.720 MT of scalp as such on which they have availed credit as inputs. The respondent paid appropriate duty treating the scalp manufactured in their factory. The Revenue raised the disp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X