2012 (4) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR MR. RANJAN GOGOI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Ms.Alka Agrawal, Adv. Mr.Gaurav Dingra, Adv.Mr.Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.F. Nariman, S.G. Nos.7 8/Applicant Ms. Bindu Saxena, Adv. in IA NO.6/12 Mr. Shailendra Swarup, AOR Ms. Aparajita Swarup, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Nigam, Adv. For R-6/ApplicantMr.Dushyant A. Dave, Sr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e applicants. When the application was taken up for consideration, Mr. Harish N. Salve, learnedsenior counsel appearing for Reliance Industries Ltd., clarified that the demand of U.P. VAT made by Reliance Industries Ltd. is based on the terms of the agreement between the parties (GSPA)and not on anything contained in the ordersofthis Court dated 23rd January, 2012, or 24th February, 2012. Ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X