TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 638X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... had relinquished their title to the brand name “ECONOPRINT” w.e.f. 29-7-1995; coupled with the finding that the extended period of limitation for demanding duty is invocable in the fact situation of the present case as fact of using brand name of another person was never disclosed by M/s. ESPL to the Department; and also because of the appreciation of the statement of Sudhir Soni, Executive Direct ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... el for the parties. The Tribunal having found, as of fact, that no record was brought to its notice either by M/s. ESPL or even by M/s. Kores (India) Ltd. to show that they had relinquished their title to the brand name ECONOPRINT w.e.f. 29-7-1995; coupled with the finding that the extended period of limitation for demanding duty is invocable in the fact situation of the present case as fact ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|