2015 (10) TMI 669

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed Tribunal has relied on the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-I v. CEGAT, Chennai - [2005 (1) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS] and recorded that the facts in that case and the present case are identical and therefore, the said decision is applicable to the present case - No reason to interfere with impugned order - Decided again .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rongly with intention to pass the unutilized Cenvat credit to customers? (ii) Whether the Hon ble Tribunal is correct in setting aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Hyderabad against the respondent (MLL), when they availed the credit contrary to the provisions of Rule 3 read with Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004? We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X