9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 716X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in the case of Unirol Airtex vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore reported in [2013 (8) TMI 614 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], by which, the Hon'ble Division Bench reversed the decision - Judgment referred to above could not be placed for consideration of this Court on account of the fact that the same was not reported immediately - held that:- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... applicant/petitioner sought for a writ of certiorari to quash the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise dated 21.03.2014. By the impugned communication, the department stated that the applicant/petitioner has not paid duty and the application Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess within the due date as stipulated under Rule 8(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 (her ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents took note of the decision of this Court in the case of Unirol Airtex vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore reported in 2013 (296) ELT 449 (Mad.) and dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to the applicant/petitioner to submit a representation to the 2nd respondent for extension of time for remitting the amou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ior to the decision in the present writ petition, the applicant/petitioner has made out a case for reviewing the order. 8. Accordingly, Review Application No.270 of 2014 is allowed and the order passed in W.P.No.11266 of 2014 dated 15.10.2014 is set aside. The writ petition is restored to the file of this Court and the Registry is directed to post the matter before the appropriate Bench during ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
