9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (12) TMI 528X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2006. 2. Learned counsel for the parties state that as a short issued is involved, the matter may be heard and disposed of without reply/counter from the respondents. We accept the said prayer. 3. The petitioners herein had filed W.P. (C) Nos. 10418/2006 and 10434/2006 sometimes in the month of April, 2006 questioning the ?Mal Roko Adesh? or seizure memo issued by the respondents under the Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (for brevity, the Act). The petitioners had transported rubber products from Kerala to Bangalore after paying VAT in Kerala and then were handed over to Container Corporation of India Limited for being transported to Delhi. It is the contention of the petitioner that the aforesaid cargo was to be transported thereafter to o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion 86 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 to be paid on or before 20.7.2006 issued by my predecessor Ld VATO has neither been interfered with by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi or by any another authority. As such, the same stands and needs to be complied with by M/s Aar Tee Transport Company. Since, in compliance to the interim orders of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi an amount of ₹ 4.00 lacs has already deposited by M/s Aar Tee Transport Company, the firm is, therefore, directed to deposit the balance amount of ₹ 3,04,628/- (out of penalty of ₹ 7,04,628/-) together-with interest @ 15% p.a. by 15.11.2011 and submit the proof of payment in the shape of DVAT 20 before the under-signed.? 7. The petitioner is aggrie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... within the period of limitation specified in Section 74(4) of the Act. 11. In these circumstances and keeping in view the earlier order passed by the High Court dated 5th October, 2010 read with order dated 29th November, 2010, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file objections on or before 6th January, 2012. In case objections are filed within the aforesaid period, the same will not be dismissed on the ground that they are barred by limitation, as we have excluded the period during which the aforesaid writ petitions had remained pending and the period during which the inquiry was conducted. It is clarified that till the objections are disposed of, no further recovery will be made. It is also clarified that the Division Bench while pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
