2015 (10) TMI 1174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Authorised Representative ORDER Per :  Mr. P.K. Das; The applicant filed this miscellaneous application for extension of period of stay vide Stay Order No. M/14613/WZB/AHD/2014 dtd  16.10.2014. 2. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt.Ltd. & others Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax - 2014-TIOL-1965-CESTAT-DEL-LB, held that the Stay Order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appeal and/or had not indulged in any protractive strategies, extension of stay could be granted (beyond the period of 365 days) by passing a speaking order disclosing the satisfaction of the Tribunal as to absence of any delay/protractive stratagems by the appellant/assessee resulting in non disposal of the appeal or that the appeal could not be disposed of on account of pendency of several app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as been granted, subject to infrastructure and organizational limitations of CESTAT. 21. The reference is answered as above.  All the present applications/ appeals shall be listed before the appropriate Bench having the roster, for disposal on merits. 3. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. 4. On the other hand, the Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X