2015 (10) TMI 1328

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Representative Per : Mr. H.K. Thakur; This appeal has been filed by the appellant with respect to OIA-SKSS/108/DMN/VAPI-I/2010 dated 29.09.2010 under which appellant's appeal was rejected on the grounds of unjust-enrichment. 2. When the case was called out for final hearing, Shri S. Suriyanarayanan, (Advocate) appeared on behalf of the appellant and Shri K. Sivakumar, (AR) appeared on behalf .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ase laws by the appellant the case is covered by the Larger Bench judgment in the case of CCE & ST, Vadodara-II vs. Panasonic Battery India Company Limited (supra). On verification of the same, I also find it so. In view of the settled preposition of law, the appeal filed by the appellant is allowed with consequential relief. (Operative part of the order pronounced in the Court)
Case laws, De .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X