TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1938X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1. Therefore, the refund claim filed by the appellant in consequence to the order, dated 31-10-2001 is within time as prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Therefore, the impugned order deserves no merit and the same is set aside. - Decided in favour of assessee. - E/2961/2005-Mum - Final Order No. A/569/2014-WZB/C-IV(SMB) - Dated:- 18-3-2014 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , 1944. 3. None appeared on behalf of the appellant nor any request for adjournment has been received. This matter is coming up for hearing for the 3rd time and all the occasions none appeared for the appellant. Therefore, the appeal is taken up for final disposal. 4. On perusal of the records, I find that the amount deposited by the appellant in the year 1997 was in dispute and the same has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|