9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (9) TMI 43X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 9-2006 - [Order]. - The petitioner has impugned the order dated 17th November, 2005 passed by the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade rejecting the appeal for non-fulfilment of export obligation and non-submission of DEEC books (import and export) duly logged by the customs authorities, shipping bills, bank realization certificate in respect of fulfilment of export obligation. 2.By an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he said licence, the notices were issued to the petitioner firm to submit all documentary evidence, however, the petitioner firm neither availed the personal hearing given on 20th March, 2001 nor submitted any proof of fulfilment of export obligation and therefore, the penalty of Rs. 18,96,636/- was imposed by order dated 3rd June, 2002. 4.The provision for appeal under Foreign Trade (Developmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Shri Priyadarshi Manish, Advocate on 28th October, 2005 that no exports had been made and the petitioners are in the process of paying the Customs duty along with interest. 5.Learned Counsel for petitioners has contended that it was the Consultant who had directly or otherwise made the import against the advance licence and forged the signatures of the petitioners on the relevant documents and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t had been made by them nor have produced the copies of DEEC books, shipping bills, realization certificate in support of fulfilment of export obligation prima facie to show that there is prima facie case in favor of petitioners. 7.In totality of facts and circumstances, no illegality, irregularity or such procedural unreasonableness can be called from the order which will entail interference un ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
