9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (12) TMI 1162X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... und claimed by the petitioner in their application in Form-XXIII dated 13.5.2009, for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 (APGST), is under challenge as being illegal and contrary to law. A consequential direction is sought to the respondent to refund the excess tax paid by them with interest at 12% per annum till the date of refund. The petitioner is a dealer on the rolls of the responden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s, would submit that the respondent has already initiated the process for refund of the said amount; a proposal has been sent to the Deputy Commissioner; his approval is awaited; and, if the hearing is adjourned by four weeks, refund would be made to the petitioner. As the Writ Petition has been pending on the file of this Court from 1.6.2010, and has suffered eight adjournments till date, we see ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
