Enhancement in value of goods - Revenue has not also explained why Rule 5 and 6 which relate to similar...

Enhancement in value of goods - Revenue has not also explained why Rule 5 and 6 which relate to similar or identical goods should not have been considered when the appellant have given the price of contemporaneous goods - Even if the contemporaneous goods do not indicate the brand, it was duty of Revenue to examine documents relating to contemporaneous imports but it failed to do so - AT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X