9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 1534X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on of delay in filing the respective appeals before the Tribunal. 2. The appellant is a Study Centre providing coaching training services to the students of various Universities. As stated that they are collecting fees from students and providing coaching services to them. Contending that the service rendered by the appellant, being one falling under the category commercial training and coaching services as defined under Section 65(26) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, they filed returns in the statutory form and also claimed exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-2005, as amended. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise issued show cause notices on 3-2-2009, 24-7-2009, 4-1-2010 and 11-3-2011, to the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Accountant had to undergo a major surgery and took rest after the surgery, for about three months, he could not present the appeal papers within time. The medical certificate issued by the Madras Medical Mission, was also produced before the Tribunal. The Revenue resisted the applications stating that the Chartered Accountant was admitted to the hospital on 20-4-2011, and discharged on 29-4-2011, and thereafter, he was advised three months rest and the appellant has not taken initiative for filing the appeals. 4. The Tribunal agreed with the contentions raised by the Revenue, and held that the delay has occurred in between 22-12-2010 and 5-2-2013 and there was no valid reason for such a long delay. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Revenue did not dispute the veracity of the medical certificate; rather, the contention of the Revenue is that the delay is inordinate. It is a settled legal principle that the law of limitation has not been enacted with an intention to defeat the rights of the parties. If the appellant is guilty of deliberately not filing the appeals within time for certain mala fide reasons, that would be a different matter. However, from the facts, we have seen that there is no such deliberate or mala fide intention in preferring the appeal memorandums belatedly. Therefore, the Tribunal ought to have exercised discretion in the matter and condoned the delay. This is more so, because a similar issue has already been dealt with by the Tribunal and the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
