2016 (1) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f duty along with interest as confirmed by the Adjudicating authority is legal and proper. So, we do not find any reason to interfere the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). - Decided against assessee. - Appeal No. : C/809-812/2003 - Order No. A/11206-11209/2015 - Dated:- 12-8-2015 - Mr. P.K. Das, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P.M. Saleem, Member (Technical) For the Respondent : Shri Alok Sri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cted the appellant to deposit of an amount of ₹ 1.50 Lakhs within a period of eight weeks and if such a deposit is made by the appellant, all the four appeals before the Tribunal shall be stand restored and the same to be heard by the Tribunal on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. It is seen from the records that the Assistant Commissioner (RRA) of Customs Ahmedabad by letter date .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... readymade garments, which were not cut or mutilated. The adjudicating authority ordered that the goods being mutilated before release in such a manner making them unserviceable as garments. The appellants filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) directed to release the goods without mutilation. The appellants cleared the goods on 26.04.2001 and 09.05.2001, classif .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X