2013 (3) TMI 655

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Rath, learned Senior Counsel as well as Mr. D.K. Dey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Ray, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax. 2. Challenge in this writ petition has been made to the demand notices dated 15-2-2013 under Annexure-2. Mr. Rath, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the challenge of the said .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. Considering the averments made in the writ petition and without going into the merit of the case, we are of the considered view that interest of justice would be best served if Annexure-2 issued by the Department to the petitioner is treated as notice under Section 28(1)(a) and the petitioner is hereby granted a period of one month time to file its show cause reply. 5. Nothing stated in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X