9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (7) TMI 18X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d:- 24-7-2007 - [Judgment per : (Oral)]. - Heard both sides. Rule. By consent rule made returnable forthwith. 2. This petition impugns an order passed by Respondent No. 4 and seeks declaration that the said order is nullity. It seeks further direction to the competent authority to decide the matter in dispute, after granting personal hearing in accordance with the direction given by this Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d in spite of such application being made to him, the Respondent No. 4 had wrongly passed the impugned order dated 12-2-2007. It appears that at the stage of hearing for admission, Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for Respondents No. 1, 3, 4 and 5 in the said petition had submitted that if this Court so directed, the competent authority would hear the petitioner's application afresh f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent authority vide letters dated 22-12-2006 and 15-1-2007, without hearing the petitioner, communicated certain directions to the present Respondent No. 4. The said directions are reproduced in paragraph three of the impugned order dated 12-2-2007 and from the same it is evident that the competent authority has decided the matter relating to condonation of delay against the petitioner on merits. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
