2015 (2) TMI 1108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... p that would be caused. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 4-12-2014. If the Appellant is of the opinion that a part of the adjudicated liability had already been deposited, it may bring it to the attention of the Tribunal itself. In that event subject to the satisfaction of the Tribunal, unless already considered, nothing prevents it from passing appropriate or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... interest within eight weeks. 3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant sought to persuade us that the amount of ₹ 17,90,023/- directed to be deposited was exorbitant and shall cause undue hardship. The Appellant has a good prima facie case. A sum of ₹ 4,50,000/- has already been deposited in part towards the adjudicated liabilities. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent opposing the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hardship, the onus lies on him/her to place the necessary facts in support of the same. 7. We have gone through the stay application filed by the Appellant before the Tribunal. Except for reciting that it would cause undue hardship, there is no material pleading with regard to the circumstances or nature of the undue hardship that would be caused. We therefore find no reason to interfere with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X