9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (12) TMI 1030X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the assessee against an order dated 30-04-2010 of the Tribunal in ITA.nos. 515, 516, 518 519/Del./2009 for the AYs 2000-01, 2002-03, 2004-05 2005-06 , seeks rectification of the aforesaid order dated 30.4.2010, requesting incorporation of the AY 2003-04 in the head note of the said order. 2. It is mentioned in the MA that though the ITAT decided on merit their appeal no.517/Del./2009 for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 0 of the ITAT in I.T.A. nos.515, 516, 518 519/Del./2009 for the AYs 2000-01, 2002-03, 2004-05 2005-06 contended that in para 8 of the impugned order, issue relating to agricultural income of ₹ 1,90,500/- ,treated as income from other sources and addition of ₹ 1,27,981/- on account of low household withdrawals in the AY 2003-04 are mentioned and therefore, the ITAT having examined t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the AYs 2000-01, 2002-03,2004-05 2005-06 on 17.3.2010, it appears to have been brought to the notice of the Bench that Revenue appeal in I.T.A. no.338/Del./2009 was pending. Accordingly, the Bench recorded the following entry on 17.3.2010 in the folder containing assessee s appeal in I.T.A. no.517/Del./09for the AY 2003-04:- 17.03.2010: Hearing adjourned to 22.04.2010 at the request ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng with ITA no. 517/D/09.Parties Informed. 5.3 Despite being aware that both the assessee s as well Revenue appeal for the AY 2003-04 are now scheduled for hearing on 24.1.2013, the ld. AR vehemently contended that mistake pointed out in MA be rectified. As is apparent from the aforesaid record of proceedings in the two appeals, claim of the ld. AR is not only misconceived but vexatious also. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
