TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 1174X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filed a Writ Petition before this Court, in which a learned single Judge of this Court had interfered with the conditional order finding that there is substance in the case put forth by the said dealer, by Ext.P24. Subsequently, the appeal itself was allowed by Ext.P24. It may not be proper for this Court to hold on the issue raised in the appeal. But still going by the afore cited facts, it is on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the CESS paid for the earlieryear was not included in computation of the amountsdetermined for compounding, the re-opening was effected.The petitioner's short contention is that CESS is notincludable in computing the compounding. However, that isa question to be considered in appeal. Normally this Courtwould not have interfered with the discretion exercised bythe Appellate Authority. 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|