TMI Blog2007 (2) TMI 134X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J. - W.P.No.8583 of 2002 is against the order of the appropriate authority, Income Tax Department to quash the order dated 27.2.2002 and to forbear the respondent from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the property. 2. The transferor one Shri.Raman Lal N.Trivedi and the transferee M/s.Jain Housing and Construction Ltd. filed F ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch encumbrance as void as per the provisions of Section 269-UE(1). Against this order, the writ petition is preferred, contending that he was in occupation from the year 1990 and that he had filed documents before the City Civil Court in O.S.No.6808 of 2001. In the circumstances, the petitioner submitted that the respondent could not require a person in lawful possession to vacate the property. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Vth Assistant City Civil Court and sought for interim injunction. He submitted that he had expended on the maintenance of the property, including payment of electricity and he needs to be paid a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. He requested that the claim, hence, be considered and orders passed. 6. As seen from the order dated 27.2.2002, the respondent had clearly stated that the petitioner had not p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|