1999 (8) TMI 966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n of India, the petitioner challenges an order dated 28di December, 1998 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal Agra whereby it partly allowed the dealer's appeals and directed that the recovery of 75 per cent of the tax shall remain stayed. 2. Counter affidavit has been filed. 3. I have heard Sri Bharatji Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Surya Prakash, learned Standing Coun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ending, inter alia, that the demands are wholly unjustified and the recovery should have been stayed during the pendency of the first appeal particularly as the petitioner is a Government of India undertaking and the Government revenue is secured. When the matter came before this Court on 1st February, 1999 an interim order was passed directing the petitioner to deposit ₹ 10 lacs towards the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X