2016 (3) TMI 705

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Udyan Verma, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, Sr. Adv., Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv., Ms. Sushma Manchanda, Adv., Mr. Prabal Bagchi, Adv. And Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. ORDER 1. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. The challenge in the appeal is against the order of the High Court of Madras imposing the condition of deposit of Rs. 200 crores (Rupees two hundre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant, the trial has not even commenced. 5. Having regard to the above and particularly the fact that the impugned condition subject to which bail had been granted has remained stayed since 17th August, 2010 we are of the view that the accused appellant should be permitted to remain on bail granted by the High Court and the condition of deposit of Rs. 200 crores (Rupees two hundred crores) should b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X