TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 705X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e condition of deposit of ₹ 200 crores should not be interfered with. - Decided in favour of appellant - Criminal Appeal No. 2066/2010 - - - Dated:- 17-3-2016 - MR. RANJAN GOGOI AND MR. PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Adv., Mr. P.S. Sudheer, Adv., Mr. Jayant Kumar Mehta, Adv., Mr. Shivanshu Singh, Adv. And Mr. Udyan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y this Court as far back as on 17th August, 2010. The effect of the aforesaid order is that the accused appellant has been on bail by virtue of the order of the High Court. A period of nearly six years has expired in the meantime. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has not been able to apprise the Court as to what is the stage of the trial. However, according to the learned counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|