9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (10) TMI 106X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... duty. - E/172/2007 - A/1446/2007-WZB/C-IV/(SMB), - Dated:- 16-10-2007 - Shri M.V. Ravindran, Member (J) [Order per] - This appeal by the Revenue is against the Order-in-Appeal No P1/300/06 dated 30-8-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune-I. 2. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. 3. The learned SDR submits that the lea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he respondents had not disputed the amounts of duty paid by them before the Commissioner (Appeals), They have, disputed only the penalty imposed on them. It is seen from the re cords the demand of the duty had arisen on the ground that the respondent had not discharged the duty liability on the scrap generated at the job worker's end and not returned to them This issue was a disputed issue and has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
