2016 (5) TMI 393

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mplied with by the co-noticee, against whom the demand was raised and not the present appellant. Consequently the dismissal of the present appellant’s appeal for failure to comply with the pre-deposit order is, on the face of it, erroneous - Held that:- the impugned order of the CESTAT is set aside and the appellant’s appeal before the CESTAT, and any connected pending application thereto, as on t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. The application is disposed of. CUSAA No. 22 of 2015 C.M. No. 25278 of 2015 (for interim relief) 5. Notice. Mr. Satish Kumar, learned Senior Standing counsel for the Respondent accepts notice. 6. This appeal by Braun Textiles Processor is directed against an order dated 9th March, 2015 of the Customs, Excise Servic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X