2015 (11) TMI 1533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es.   For the Respondent Through Mr Satish Kumar, Advocate Mr P.C. Aggarwal, Advocate for DRI, Lucknow with Mr Sanjeev Katiyar, Intelligence Officer and Mr Kirtesh Pandit, Superintendent. O R D E R  On 21.09.2015, when this matter was taken up for hearing on the first occasion, we had passed the following order:- "W.P.(C) 8946/2015 & CM No.20098/2015(stay) W.P.(C) 9080/2015 & CM No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the orders-in-original have been passed. Because of the aforesaid two points raised by the petitioners, it is contended by them that the principles of natural justice have been violated and they have not been given an adequate opportunity of representing their case. It is for this reason that they contend that the filing of appeals would be an exercise in futility and approaching this Court unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... le the petitioner made a request for the relied upon documents, the same were not supplied to the petitioner. As a result, the impugned order-in-original dated 08.06.2015 would have to be set aside on this ground alone. Consequently, we set aside the impugned order-in-original dated 08.06.2015 and direct the adjudicating authority to supply copies of all the relied upon documents within a week to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X