2015 (10) TMI 2505

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er the provisions of Finance Act, 1994 to review his own order - Held that:- the impugned order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting the assessees appeal is in the circumstances impeccable and warrants no appellate interference. - Decided against the appellant
MR. G. RAGHURAM, PRESIDENT AND MR. B. RAVICHANDRAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Akhil Gupta, C.A. For .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssessee provided construction service during 2007-08 and 2008-09. 3. The impugned order was passed on the ground that the appellant failed to pre-deposit of ₹ 5 lakhs, ordered to be pre-deposited on 15.07.2013 by the lower appellate authority. The fact that the assessee failed to comply with the pre-deposit ordered on 15.07.2003 is not in dispute. The impugned order also notices that the ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X