2016 (6) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der of the ITAT is concurring with that of the CIT(A), the reasons for deleting the penalty have been adequately discussed in the concurrent orders of the CIT (A) and the ITAT. The Court is not persuaded to hold that the said order suffer from any legal infirmity. - ITA 354/2016 & CM APPL No. 21901-2/2016 - - - Dated:- 31-5-2016 - S. Muralidhar And Vibhu Bakhru, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Assessing Officer ( AO ) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 6. Apart from the fact that the order of the ITAT is concurring with that of the CIT(A), the reasons for deleting the penalty have been adequately discussed in the concurrent orders of the CIT (A) and the ITAT. The Court is not persuaded to hold that the said order suffer from any legal infirmity. 7. No substantial question of law .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X