TMI Blog2009 (12) TMI 972X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssanjee and Mr.S.J.Mehta 1. Heard. Perused appeals. 2. Mr.Chatterjee Tried to canvass that the Assessing Officer did not take into account the actuarial valuation report for the period ended on 31st March, 2001 and 31st March, 2002 respectively and therefore, the Revisional Authority was justified in exercising the powers u/s.263 of the Act and that the Tribunal was in error in setting ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ubmission, thus, made by Mr.Chatterjee does not hold water. 4. Mr.Chatterjee, so far as other questions sought to be raised in the appeal are concerned, fairly states that they have been dealt with by the Tribunal with which no fault can be found. 5. In the above view of the matter, none of the questions need consideration. The appeals are, therefore, liable to be dismissed for want of subst ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|