2008 (8) TMI 931

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dvocate for the respondent No.3 ORDER 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that goods belonging to him lying in the compound at Khasra No.421, Village Hirekunda, Nangloi, Delhi have been seized by respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondents had with an intention to seize the goods belonging to M/s.Navshakti Industries Pvt. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sued to respondent No.3 to consider his representation and thereafter pass a speaking order. 5. Despite service, no one is present on behalf respondent No.3. Mr. Gaurav Duggal, who is present in Court, is requested to accept notice and to appear in the matter. 6. No prejudice would be caused to respondents No.1 and 2, if the representation of the petitioner, which ought to have been cons .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X