2007 (8) TMI 253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s that in workload, office lost sight of the fact that the matter was dismissed for default for not taking further steps - lapse on part of office of Counsel should not be suffered by applicant – appeal restored - 1605 of 2004 - - - Dated:- 17-8-2007 - N.V. Dabholkar and M.G. Gaikwad, JJ. [Order per Court]. - 1. Heard learned Assistant Solicitor General, for the applicant and learned Adv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... disposed of. Delay is condoned. 5. So far as Civil Application No. 2354/2007 is concerned, the parent appeal i.e. First Appeal No.1605/2004 was already admitted by this court on 22-1-2005. Notice to sole respondent was returned unserved and it appears that thereafter, there were no steps taken for effecting service. Learned Advocate Shri Basarkar vehemently opposes setting aside the order of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X