2016 (7) TMI 602

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioner requested for extending the period of the Scheme. - Held that:- petitioner is not entitled for any relief. - The Scheme is statutory in nature and unless the provisions in the statute are complied within the time specified, it shall always be open for the respondent authorities to take necessary steps to collect the interest as well as penalty in accordance with law. As far as the prohibitor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ration. However, the petitioner could not remit the amount as specified under the Scheme within the stipulated time. Petitioner therefore requested for extending the period of the Scheme. The Scheme came to be rejected in terms of Ext.P3. 3. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 inter alia contending that the Scheme had worked out itself and if no payment is made in ter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioner is entitled for any relief. The Scheme is statutory in nature and unless the provisions in the statute are complied within the time specified, it shall always be open for the respondent authorities to take necessary steps to collect the interest as well as penalty in accordance with law. Therefore, the challenge to Ext.P3 is not justified. 6. As far as the prohibitory order is concerned, ev .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X