9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 142X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions of license granted by virtue of advance authorization No.0410078753 dated 21.02.2006 - Held that:- the bonafides of the petitioner may be reconsidered by the first respondent, after inviting appropriate report from the third respondent in this regard. - matter remanded back. - W.P.No.39605 of 2015, M.P.No.1 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 5-7-2016 - E T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For the Petitioner : M ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng physical penalty on the petitioner to the tune of ₹ 15 lakhs on the ground that the petitioner has failed to fulfill the conditions of license granted by virtue of advance authorization No.0410078753 dated 21.02.2006. Before the appellate authority, namely the first respondent, the petitioner though did not appear in person submitted a detailed written submissions stating that the entire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioner was not extended the benefit of amnesty, though the petitioner had paid the duty liability which was remaining to be paid i.e., a sum of ₹ 2,50,000/- by Demand Draft dated 30.06.2014, well beyond the cut off date fixed in the Public Notice No.22, dated 12.08.2013. 4.The counter affidavit filed by the third respondent shows that the petitioner has sent a letter dated 28.03.2014 to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s to encash the Bank Guarantee by letter dated 28.03.2014 which is well before the cut off date i.e., 31.03.2014. 6.In the counter affidavit filed by the second respondent it has been stated that to avail the benefit of Public Notice No.22, dated 12.08.2013, the last date for payment was 31.03.2014. There can be no quarrel to this position and in fact, the learned counsel for the third responde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
