2016 (8) TMI 639

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st litigation at the behest of such a person should never be entertained. Held that:- We are not inclined to entertain this public interest litigation filed by the petitioner, though we expect that the authorities would complete their task qua the consignments in question. We are also of the view that considering the antecedents of the petitioner and his endeavour to rake up an earlier issue t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities (COFEPOSA) vide detention order dated 08.11.2000 and imposition of penalties by the department have been upheld by the Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner's earlier endeavour to claim CBI enquiry has also been repelled in Crl.O.P.No.1525 of 2006, decided on 11.01.2008 relating to some other goods. In this proceedings, it is noted .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the consignments may have truth. In that behalf, investigation has been carried out and prima facie forgery of Customs documents has been found. Naturally, proper action in that behalf would be required. 6. We are not inclined to entertain this public interest litigation filed by the petitioner, though we expect that the authorities would complete their task qua the consignments in question .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X