TMI Blog2007 (11) TMI 254X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any payment of interest or penalty or made any arrangement for payment of the said sum, so there is no justification to interfere with the impugned order of CIT(A) – assessee’s appeal dismissed - 21619 of 1999 - - - Dated:- 28-11-2007 - C. N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR J. JUDGMENT [C. N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR J.] —1. The petitioner is challenging exhibit P11 order whereunder the Commissioner of In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... est or penalty or made any arrangement for payment of the said sum. Even though counsel submitted that the petitioner has made arrangement for payment, there is nothing to indicate as to what was the arrangement made for payment. The demand is raised for the assessment years 1983-84 to 1986-87 and the impugned order was passed 12 years after the last year for which demand was raised. The petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|