2016 (9) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. K. Mohanamurali learned counsel for the respondents and with their consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release One Gold Chain, weighting 119 Grams pursuant to the orders passed by the Commissioner of C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which the petitioner had to pay a fine of Rs. 90,000/- and pay personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- . But, till date, this order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) dated 28.09.2015 has not been followed or altered or modified. Now, the petitioner has sought for implementation of the order and release of gold chain. 4. It is pertinent to note that the representation given by the petitioner to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) on 28.09.2015 and inspite of lapse of several months, till date nothing worthwhile has transpired in the review application. That apart, there is no interim order staying the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 6. In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the fourth respondent to return the jewel in question subject to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X