9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (10) TMI 156X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the years 2013-14 and 2014-15, and pass reasoned orders thereon, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the applications, dated 13.10.2015, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter, by passing this order. - Writ petition allowed - W.P.Nos.36771 and 36772 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 13-7-2016 - MR. M. JAICHANDREN J. Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan for the Petitioner. Mr. Su. Srinivasan, ASG for the Respondent. ORDER Heard. 2 Both these writ petitions have been filed, praying th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ort of services, so as to create a powerful and unique Served from India brand, which would be instantly recognized and respected the world over. Paragraph 3.12.2 of the Foreign Trade Policy stipulates the service providers, who are eligible to avail the benefit of the said scheme. As per paragraph 3.12.2 of the Foreign Trade Policy, the Indian service providers of the services, listed in Appendix 41 of the Handbook of Procedures, who have foreign exchange earnings of at least ₹ 10 lakhs in the current financial year, are eligible for duty credit scrip. 5 It has been further stated that in terms of the Served from India Scheme , notified under the Foreign Trade Policy, the petitioner had submitted an application, dated 12.2.2014 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e not settled by the audit, in a similar case, pertaining to some other service provider. 7 It has been stated that in terms of the Served from India Scheme , notified under the Foreign Trade Policy, the petitioner had submitted applications, dated 13.10.2015, for the services rendered, during the periods 2013-14 and 2014-15. The said applications filed by the petitioner had been rejected by the impugned orders, dated 29.10.2015, issued by the second respondent, stating as follows : Your Application has been rejected due to following reasons: 1.Claim included for foreign rebate, freight discount, peak season surcharge and services tax - These are not classified as services. 2.Foreign exchange earnings credited in to your EEFC ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
