2016 (11) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... orce beyond 7.8.2014, whether any application is required to be considered by the Bench for extending stay order; on the fact of omissions of 1st, 2nd and 3rd proviso to Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act 1944 - Held that: - relianceplaced in the decision of the case M/s. Venketeshwara Filaments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. C.C.E. & S.T., Vapi [2014 (12) TMI 227 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD] where it was hel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppellant seeks extension of stay on the ground that the appeal has not come up for disposal for no fault of theirs. In this regard we find that in the case of M/s. Venketeshwara Filaments Pvt. Ltd. Ors. Vs. C.C.E. S.T., Vapi-2014-TIOL-2388-CESTAT-AHM, the Tribunal observed as under:- The omissions of 1st, 2nd and 3rd proviso to section 35C(2A) of the CEA, 1944 now has to be read to the ef .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rs granted by section 35C of the CEA, 1944 would remain in force. The Tribunal finally concluded that: Any stay order passed by the Tribunal, if it is in force beyond 07.08.2014, it would continue till the disposal of the appeals and there is no need for filling any further applications for extension of orders granting stay either fully or partially. 3. In the light of the aforesa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X