2016 (11) TMI 349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i Ashutosh Nath, Asst. Commr (AR), for respondent Per: M.V. Ravindran                 This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal No. AT/442/RGD/2005 dated 29.08.2005. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is whether the Modvat credit availed by appellant during the period A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ron ore pellets. 4. On perusal of records, we find that there is no dispute as to the fact that appellant is eligible to avail CENVAT credit on the iron ore fines and has followed the procedure of Rule 57F of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 for converting the same into iron ore pellets from the jobworker. It is also undisputed that the jobworker has converted the iron ore fines into pell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dispatched iron ore fines on receipt of iron ore pellets. Revenue has not contested those submissions made by appellant before them. In our view, once it is established that iron ore pellets are received back from the jobworker, nothing survives in these appeals and the recredit availed by the appellant is correct. Looking at the entire issue from a different angle, we find that the appellant coul .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X