TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 551X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the RSP. In the considered view of the Court, instead of surmising on this aspect the Commissioner could easily have undertaken an enquiry with the concerned Department to ascertain whether in fact the goods were purchased at a price higher than the RSP. Consequently, the Court does not see any substantial question arising from the impugned order of the CESTAT - appeal dismissed. - CUSAA No. 15 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tly allowing the appeal filed by the Respondent against the adjudication Order-in-Original dated 29th April, 2009 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) New Delhi. 5. The case against the Respondent was that imported audio-visual equipments were found in the business premises of the Appellant which did not have the maximum retail price ( MRP ) displayed on the packing although the g ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|