2016 (12) TMI 1308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oushik Dey, Adv., for the respondent ORDER The Court : The petitioner assails a show-cause issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) dated August 18, 2009. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that, the importation of the goods received consideration of the authorities at diverse levels including before the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court. He submits that, ultimatel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urity. The learned Advocate for the DRI submits that, the show-cause is still alive. He further submits that, the show-cause was issued on the basis of fresh evidences and, therefore, the DRI should be allowed to proceed with the show-cause. He also submits, that the petitioner may be directed to approach the deciding authority with objection, which the deciding authority will decide in accordanc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on was denied and the application of the DRI for such purpose was dismissed. The order dated October 16, 2012 allows the DRI to take appropriate action as may be advised. No material has been placed on record to suggest that, the DRI has taken any steps subsequent to the show-cause dated August 18, 2009. In view of the order dated October 16, 2012 passed by the Division Bench in relation to the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X