9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2016 (4) TMI 1169X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate for UOI Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate and Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate for DRI Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate for Customs Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondent Mr. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.9 Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate , Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate , Mr. Amardeep Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Akshay ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the afore-mentioned period is liable to be declared as detention of the goods, for all the consignments were lying in the custody of Custom Authorities and the petitioners were unable to accept the delivery due to pending investigation. (3) The petitioners' further contention is that the 'detention order' cannot be withheld on an erroneous premise that the material imported by them are 'off ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orth by the Mumbai Port Authority or controverted by the petitioners. (6) Learned counsel for the Mumbai Port Trust shall also have instructions as to why the two undisputed consignments have not been released. We further direct that in case there is no claim pending in respect thereto, the undisputed consignments be released forthwith. (7) Meanwhile, the Custom Authorities are further directed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o.3552261 dated 11.12.2015; and No.3749151 dated 29.12.2015 and also for inspection/examination of goods in respect of Bill of Entries No.4205063 dated 09.02.2016 and Bill No.4289284 dated 17.02.2016, which are scheduled to be held on 5th or 6th April, 2015. (10) Written statements filed by respondents No.1,2,3,5,6,7&8 (CWP-4641-2016 & CWP-4648-2016) are taken on record, copy given to counsel opp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
