9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1506X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aid order in this Writ Petition, when the petitioner seeks for implementation of the order passed in Order-in-Appeal, dated 14.09.2015. Thus, on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court has no other option, except, to direct the respondents to comply with the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), dated 14.09.2015 - petition allowed - decided in favor of petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... which, the Joint Commissioner ordered for confiscation of the gold bars carried by the petitioner, and gave an option to redeem the same on payment of fine of ₹ 25,25,000/- for re-export in terms of Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter, referred to as 'the Act'). The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), by order, dated 14.09.2015, disposed of the Appeal and modified the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent of India under Section 129 DD of the Act. This Review Application was taken on file and numbered as Revision Application No.15 of 2016. Though the Revision Application has been pending since 5th May, 2016, till date, no orders have been passed. 4. The learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents made elaborate submissions on the factual grounds and raised legal contentions as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondents to comply with the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), dated 14.09.2015. However, the interest of the Revenue should also to be safeguarded and this Court is of the view that the following order will meet the ends of justice. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of, by directing the respondents to comply with the order passed by the Commissioner of C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
