9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 1205X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch of Mumbai restored the above said the issues to the file of CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in the light of order passed by ITAT, Mumbai in the case of Hitesh S. Mehta Vs. DCIT [2013 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI ] to readjudicate the matter in view of the observations made therein. - I.T.A. No.8479/Mum/2010, I.T.A. NO. 1723/Mum/2013 - - - Dated:- 15-1-2016 - S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT ME ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the liability amounting to ₹ 15,78,212/- ₹ 26,77,555/- on account of interest expenses in the above mentioned appeals respectively and also raised other grounds with regard to the confirming the calculation of book profit u/s. 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961( in short the Act ) amounting to ₹ 7,74,534/- ₹ 10,28,561/- respectively. At the very outset, the learned cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ITA No.7726 7727/M/2010 dated 26.04.2013 to readjudicate the matter in view of the observations made therein. 3. Therefore in the said circumstance wedirect the CIT(A) to decide the matter of controversy in the light of the order passed by the ITAT, Mumbai in the case of Hitesh S. Mehta Vs. DCIT vide ITA No.7726 7727/M/2010 dated 26.04.2013. Accordingly the appeals of the assessee is herby allo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
