9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (2) TMI 1338X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent of teachers on honorarium basis. These were challenged before the High Court of judicature at Bombay, and the division bench passed interim direction by order dated 16th August, 2000. We extract the said directions of the division bench: i) The G.R. would apply only to the aided institutions and the unaided schools, junior colleges etc. will not be covered by the scheme. ii) The G.R. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... td. V-VII) (as against ₹ 2500/-), ₹ 4000/- for secondary teachers (as against ₹ 3000/- and ₹ 5000/- for higher secondary teachers (as against ₹ 3500/-. vi) The Shikshan Sevak will be appointed for a duration of 3 years and upon successful completion of the said period, he/she will be absorbed in service and treated as a regular teacher within the meaning of MEPS ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y be filled in by an untrained teacher subject to an appropriate undertaking that he/she will acquire the necessary qualification within the prescribed period. xii) Lady Shikshan Sevak will be entitled to maternity leave as prescribed under the MEPS Rules, 1981. 3. In the said order it is also stated that the learned advocate general of the state assured the court that the state governme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing to the satisfaction of all but the state government is finding it difficult to implement the scheme in view of the subsequent order of the division bench of the same High Court. 6. In our view, the division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad ought not to have disturbed the earlier order passed by a coordinate bench of the same High Court at Bombay. In order to maintain judicial di ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
