2004 (11) TMI 593

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JUDGMENT [Judgment per : B.J. Shethna, J.]. - Rule in both the petitions. Ms. Nayna K. Gadhvi, learned Addl. Standing Counsel with Shri Jitendra Malkan, Standing Counsel waive service of Rule for the respondents. 2. Both these petitions are disposed of by this common order as they are arising out of impugned common order dated 24-7-2003 passed by CEGAT, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai, dismiss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d, but not considered and dealt with in the impugned order. There is also 2 Members Bench decision of CEGAT in the case of Mysore Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Bangalore, reported in 1999 (107) E.L.T. 68, the same was also not considered. However, another learned Single Member of the CEGAT refused to entertain modification Application on the ground that it cannot be said to be an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X