1980 (7) TMI 267

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ontended that that Section 4(c) of the Consolidation of Holdings Prevention of Fragmentation Act 1956 was violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India. In his submission, the provisions that any proceeding in a civil Court of the nature covered by Section 4(c) would be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Consolidation authorities and any order passed by a civil Court regardi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ood abated, which of course, means that the civil proceeding comes to nought. Regarding the constitutional submissions we are not called upon to investigate the merits for the short reason that both the points have been covered by two decisions of this Court Ham Adhar Singh v. Ramroee Singh and Ors. and Chattar Singh and Ors. v. Thakur Prasad Singh Indeed, High Court has merely followed these two .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X