TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 371X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lu Mutke, Consultant for the Respondent Per : Ramesh Nair The present appeal filed by the revenue against the order in original no. 66-68 and 68a to 68h (21- 23A to 23H /RT) COMMR. / 04-05 dated 24/12/2004 passed by the Commissioner Of Central Excise and Customs, Raigad. 2. The fact of the case is that the respondent is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely "Bars and Rods of non ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondent supposed to opt for Section 3A and demand of duty on the job work as the respondent is not entitled for exemption notification No.214/86-C.E. 3. Shri Balu Mutke Ld. Consultant appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted a letter from the Respondent according to which the respondent had also filed an appeal before this Tribunal which was allowed vide Tribunal's order No.A/2060/WZB/MUM/2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|