2014 (12) TMI 1267

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioners and this authorization has been signed by only one Commissioner. Therefore, the authorization signed by the Commissioners is defective - appeals dismissed as defective and non-maintainable. - E/2306-2308/2006-EX(SM) - Final Order Nos. A/54913-54915/2014-EX(SM) - Dated:- 29-12-2014 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) Shri R.K. Mishra, DR, for the Appellant. Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reproduced here for ease of convenience : OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, LUCKNOW 7-A, ASHOK MARG, LUCKNOW C. No. IV-127/R/O/2005 Dated :- [Authorization under sub-section (2) of Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944] Whereas, in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, a Committee comprising of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Lucknow under Section 35A is not proper and legal on the grounds specified in the Grounds of Appeal . Therefore, in exercise of the power vested in it under the said sub-section 35B(2) the said Committee hereby authorize Shri Anuj Kumar, Joint Commissioner (Review), Central Excise Commissionerate, Lucknow and direct him to file an appeal on its behalf to the Appellate Tribunal against the said .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X