9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 738X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri Rakesh Goyal, Addl. Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : P.R. Chandrasekharan, Member (T)]. - The appeal and stay application are directed against Order-in-Original No. 56/ST-II/WLH/2012, dated 28-5-2012 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II. 2. The appellant, M/s. Rashi Enterprises, Bhandup (W), Mumbai is engaged in supply of man-power. They ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd demanded Service Tax of ₹ 74,47,961/- along with interest thereon and also proposing to impose penalties. The appellant contested the demand and submitted before the authority a list of workers supplied by them to various units in the SEZ and letters from the concerned units stating that the service of the workers has been consumed by those units. The learned adjudicating authority, for r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng agency through their Chartered Accountant along with a register of adult workers and muster roll along with the workers details to show that the services of these labourers have been supplied by the appellant for the in-factory consumption by the units in the SEZ. In spite of these evidences, the lower adjudicating authority came to the conclusion that the service has not been consumed in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ge. Therefore, after waiving the requirement of pre-deposit, we take up the appeal itself for consideration. 5.1 As rightly pointed out by the learned Counsel for the appellant, there is no dispute about the fact that the recipients of service are units of SEZ and services provided are man-power supply service and the said service is an eligible service for the purpose of Notification No. 4/2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
