TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 1484X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... public property leased out at a very meagre rent. It cannot be utilised for a purpose other than the purpose for which it was leased out. True it is that the appellant may have been permitted to raise construction on the leased land but it is obvious that the construction to be raised should have connection with the original business of the company i.e. running an oil mill. The appellant has raised a huge commercial complex earning crores of rupees but is paying only a few hundred rupees to the Municipality. The appellant is not entitled to claim that lease deed must be renewed in his favour. The High Court of Gujarat was perfectly justified in holding that the appellant cannot claim that he is entitled to renewal of the lease deed as a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d was granted for a further period of 30 years. Relevant portion of the lease deed reads as follows: The Deed of Lease would be renewed on expiry of the same. And based on the conditions prevailing at that time changes in the amount of rent may be made by the Municipality. The Municipality will have the right to do so The aforesaid lease deed was to expire in the year 1982. 4. It appears that, in the meanwhile, the Savarkundla Municipality issued two notices to the appellant company in the year 1976 asking the appellant company to handover the land to the Municipality. A dispute arose since the company did not handover the possession of the leased property. Thereafter, this dispute was referred to the Arbitration. The Arbitrat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Award was passed in favour of the company and the Decree in terms of the Award had also been passed, the Collector, Savarkundla cancelled the lease deed on the ground that the appellant was trying to raise construction on the land in question. Thereafter, the appellant filed a Writ Petition being Special Civil Application No. 845 of 1978. This Writ Petition was allowed and the order of the Collector was set aside. Thereafter also, no lease deed was executed since the Municipality did not have the power to execute the lease deed for more than 10 years. Finally, on 23.10.1991, the Government of Gujarat issued an order that the lease deed may be renewed for a further term of 30 years from 01.04.1982. In actual fact, this lease deed was only ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ermission shall be granted if such land forms a street or part of a street which has been declared to be a public street under section 148. 9. A bare perusal of the aforesaid section makes it very clear that the Municipality has no authority to grant a lease for a period exceeding 10 years without prior permission of the State Government. In the present case, the State Government had only granted permission to lease the land till the year 2012. Therefore, the appellant has no inherent right to claim that fresh lease be granted in its favour. 10. Another factor which has to be considered is that the original lease was granted for running an oil mill and as on date admittedly there is no oil mill situated on the land. The leased prop ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|